Invest in your success.
JVRA helps lawyers win cases by providing critical information you can use to establish precedent, determine demand and win arguments.
Verdict range $0 - $100,000
ARTICLE ID 167937
$________ Sexual harassment - Fair Housing Act violation - Landlord demands sexual favor for return of security deposit - Ongoing sexual harassment during tenancy - "Me-too" testimony of other tenants admitted - Emotional distress.
United stateorgs Dist. Ct. For No. Dist. Iowa
The plaintiff sued her landlord for sexual harassment
and discrimination under the Fair Housing Act (Title VIII of the
Civil Rights Act of ________, 42 U.S.C. Sec. ________ et seq.) and the
Iowa Civil Rights Acts (Iowa Code Sec. ________ et seq.) alleging that
he touched her inappropriately, would not return her housing
security deposit unless she engaged in some kind of sexual act
with him, and that his actions caused her to feel insecure and
unsafe in her home. The defendant denied the plaintiffs
allegations, contending that his conduct did not rise to a level
actionable under the law and that the Eighth Circuit does not
recognize a cause of action for sexual harassment causing a
hostile housing situation.
The defendant was the plaintiffs landlord. At trial, the
plaintiff argued that the defendant sexually harassed her at the
property he rented to her. She testified that the defendant
stroked her arm when he was showing her properties, and that
after she rented from him, he stroked his hand on her bare
stomach and made inappropriate comments about her 14-year-old
sisters breasts. He stood unnecessarily close to her, and
sometimes rubbed against her when passing by. He often rubbed his
groin area in her presence, and would come to her home, 3 3 unannounced, and lounge on her sofa. He had a key to her
apartment, and the plaintiff testified that she believed that the
defendant had entered her bedroom when she was not home.
The plaintiff showed that male tenants were not subject to
similar treatment. She introduced testimony from Pat Johnson, an
investigator from the Sioux City Human Rights Commission, who
testified that other women tenants had complained about similar
treatment by the defendant, Dale Winter. The court allowed the
plaintiff to present testimony from other women who had rented
property from Winter that they, too, had been harassed by him.
The court excluded testimony from one such witness on the grounds
that her tenancy was too remote in time for her testimony to be
probative. The plaintiff testified that when she requested that
the defendant return her security deposit, he stated "my eagle
eyes havent seen everything yet," which the plaintiff
interpreted to mean that the defendant would not return the
deposit unless the plaintiff gave defendant some kind of sexual
favors. (In fact, the defendant did not return the plaintiffs
security deposit; it was the subject of a breach of contract
claim for $________ at trial.)
The plaintiff sued for emotional distress based on her own
testimony and the circumstances; she did not produce medical
testimony to support that claim. The parties stipulated that the
plaintiff had a history of anxiety and depression before trial.
The plaintiff sought damages equal to the amount of rent she paid
while she suffered sexual harassment by the defendant. She also
sought punitive damages on the grounds that the defendant had
acted with an evil motive or knowing indifference to the
plaintiffs rights.
The defendant denied the plaintiffs claims on the grounds that
his actions were not serious enough to state a cause of action.
He argued that the Eighth Circuit does not recognize a cause of
action for creating a hostile housing environment due to sexual
harassment. He also contended that the court incorrectly admitted
the "me-too" testimony of the defendants former tenants, and
that the court improperly excluded medical evidence about the
plaintiffs mental health, arguing that the plaintiff had put it
at issue by seeking damages for emotional distress. The court
ruled in the plaintiffs favor on those arguments.
After trial, the jury awarded the plaintiff compensatory damages
of $________ based on the rent she had paid during the time she was
sexually harassed and discriminated against, $________ for her
security deposit (under the breach of contract claim), and
$________ in punitive damages. In post-trial motions, the court
reduced the punitive damages award to $________, one and one-
half times the compensatory damages, under the guidance of Philip
Morris U.S.A. vs. Williams and B.M.W., Inc. vs. Gore. The
plaintiff sought approximately $________ in attorneys fees; the
court awarded fees of $________.
5 ways to win with JVRA
JVRA gives you jurisdiction-specific, year-round insight into the strategies, arguments and tactics that win. Successful attorneys come to the table prepared and use JVRA to:
- Determine if a case is winnable and recovery amounts.
- Determine reasonable demand for a case early on.
- Support a settlement demand by establishing precedent.
- Research trial strategies, tactics and arguments.
- Defeat or support post-trial motions through past case histories.
Try JVRA for a day or a month, or sign up for our deluxe Litigation Support Plan and put the intelligence of JVRA to work for all of your clients. See our subscription plans.