Invest in your success.
JVRA helps lawyers win cases by providing critical information you can use to establish precedent, determine demand and win arguments.
ARTICLE ID 160288
Product liability - Alleged food contamination - Sharp nail-like object in hamburger - Tongue and gum injuries - TMJ - Severe migraine headaches.
Manatee County, FL
The plaintiff alleged that he bit into a hard metal
object which was contained in a hamburger he purchased from the
defendant, a franchisee of Wendys International. The defendant
denied that its hamburger was contaminated and maintained that
the plaintiffs claim was fraudulent.
The plaintiff testified that on February 24, ________, he purchased a
take-out hamburger at the defendants fast food restaurant. The
plaintiff testified that he bit into the hamburger at his place
of employment and his mouth closed on a hard metal object that
resembled a nail. The plaintiff introduced the metal object at
trial. The plaintiff, age 45 at the time, was seen by EMS
personnel at the time of the incident and later that evening, he
drove himself to the emergency room.
The plaintiff claimed that biting down on the metal object caused
injuries to his tongue and gums, TMJ and severe migraine
headaches which required four emergency room visits. The
plaintiff underwent bilateral arthroscopic TMJ surgery and
claimed $________ in medical expenses.
The defendants biochemistry expert testified that he examined
the metal object which the plaintiff allegedly took out of his
mouth after biting into the hamburger. The traces of saliva on
the metal object contained no starch which the defendants expert
testified indicated that the metal object was not in the
plaintiffs mouth at the same time as a hamburger bun.
The defendant stressed that the plaintiff saw three separate
doctors yet did not make any complaints of jaw pain until some
three months after the alleged incident. The defendants
oral/maxillofacial surgery expert opined that the plaintiffs TMJ
symptoms were not related to the alleged incident. Evidence also
indicated that the plaintiff had been convicted of seven prior
felonies.
The jury found no negligence on the part of the defendant which
was a legal cause of injury to the plaintiff. The jury also found
that the defendants hamburger was not defective. The defendants
motion to tax attorney fees and costs is pending.
5 ways to win with JVRA
JVRA gives you jurisdiction-specific, year-round insight into the strategies, arguments and tactics that win. Successful attorneys come to the table prepared and use JVRA to:
- Determine if a case is winnable and recovery amounts.
- Determine reasonable demand for a case early on.
- Support a settlement demand by establishing precedent.
- Research trial strategies, tactics and arguments.
- Defeat or support post-trial motions through past case histories.
Try JVRA for a day or a month, or sign up for our deluxe Litigation Support Plan and put the intelligence of JVRA to work for all of your clients. See our subscription plans.