$________ RECOVERY – Medical Malpractice – Anesthesiology – ERCP procedure results in death of 60-year-old father survived by a minor child.

________ VERDICT MEDICAL MALPRACTICE – GASTROENTEROLOGY – ________ DOCTOR IMPROPERLY PERFORMS CONTRAINDICATED PROCEDURE ON ________ EXACERBATING ________ GASTROINTESTINAL ISSUES.

$________ VERDICT – MEDICAL MALPRACTICE – NEGLIGENT PERFORMANCE OF LAPORASCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY – SURGICAL CLIPS CAUSE CRUSH INJURY TO COMMON HEPATIC DUCT – ADHESIONS

$________ CONFIDENTIAL RECOVERY Medical Malpractice – Surgery negligence – Negligent injury of common bile duct and right hepatic artery during laparoscopic cholectystectomy – ________ may require future liver transplant

$________ CONFIDENTIAL RECOVERY – MEDICAL MALPRACTICE – GASTROENTEROLOGY – NEGLIGENCE IN PERFORMING ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY WITHOUT SUFFICIENT TRAINING – SEPTIC SHOCK – WRONGFUL DEATH OF 49-YEAR-OLD PATIENT.

________' VERDICT Medical Malpractice – Gastroenterology – Alleged negligent performance of laparoscopic cholecystectomy – Transection of cystic duct – Co-________ gastroenterologist allegedly performs ERCP in negligent fashion, perforating duodenum – Need for corrective surgery several month hospitalization – Subsequent surgical revision – Significant abdominal scarring.

$________ CONFIDENTIAL RECOVERY Medical Malpractice – Surgery – Negligent single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy – Liver damage during surgery resulting in need for liver transplant for 25-year-old ________.

$________ RECOVERY Medical Malpractice – Surgery – Failure to rule out bile leak when patient exhibits signs of chest/abdominal pain, tachycardia and low oxygen saturation following laparoscopic gall gladder removal – Leak continues for 36 hours – Peritonitis – Multiple surgeries – Mild hypoxic injury.

________ verdict on liability - Medical Negligence - The ________ suffered complications following a laparoscopic cholecystectomy ? at a first jury trial in ________, the surgeon prevailed ? the ________ prevailed on appeal on an evidence question and the case was tried again four years later ? the second jury was stuck at 7-5 and a ________ was declared ? at this third trial a verdict was reached and it was for the doctor

________ VERDICT Medical malpractice - Gastroenterology - Failure to diagnose sphincter dysfunction - Failure to remove gallbladder in timely manner - Pain and suffering.