. .

Your search results for Eminent Domain


Filtration options are available for subscribers only.

Try JVRA for a day or a month, or sign up for our deluxe Litigation Support Plan and put the intelligence of JVRA to work for all of your clients. See our subscription plans.


#1
$________ VERDICT – BREACH OF FIDUCIARY DUTY – WRONGFUL FORECLOSURE – BUSINESSWOMAN SUES FORMER PARTNER AFTER FORECLOSURE.
127th Judicial District Court (195440)
#2
$________ VERDICT – Eminent Domain – Impairment to value of property remaining – ________ condemned ________ property for construction of a communications tower and building
Rutland County, VT (194612)
#3
$________ VERDICT – Breach of contract – Misappropriation of trade secrets and proprietary information – Shale Prospecting Company sues oil company for breaching confidentiality and non-circumvention agreement – Compensatory and punitive damages
152nd Judicial District Court, Harris County (194719)
#4
$________ VERDICT – EMINENT DOMAIN – STATE TAKES SMALL PARCEL OF LAND FOR ROAD CONSTRUCTION PROJECT INVOLVING ELIMINATION OF TRAFFIC CIRCLE – RAMP, PARAPET WALL, AND GUARDRAIL PLACED AS PART OF NEW CONSTRUCTION OBSTRUCTS PASSING VIEW OF DEALERSHIP –SIGNIFICANTLY REDUCES VALUE PERMANENTLY
Burlington County, NJ (194419)
#5
$________ VERDICT Minority shareholder action – Wrongful takeover of corporate control - Improper rescission of stock sale – Breach of fiduciary duty – Liquidation of corporation.
Miami-Dade County, FL (193878)
#6
$________ RECOVERY– Eminent domain – ________ property owners alleged that the taking of its property amounted to a total taking, due to inaccessibility
Withheld County, MA (193707)
#7
$________ VERDICT Eminent Domain – ________ service station business owner contends stability associated with long term history of business and location justifies higher value than would otherwise be the case – ________ business owner to move for attorney and expert fees under statute providing such relief when final offer by public entity is determined to be unreasonable.
Orange County, CA (192131)
#8
$________ VERDICT State Liability – Eminent Domain – ________ alleges the property taken by the state for a highway widening project had a greater value due to development plans and location.
Rockingham County, NH (192171)
#9
DEFAULT JUDGMENT – EMINENT DOMAIN – NEPA – PRO-SE ________ WINS DEFAULT JUDGMENT AGAINST ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS FOR FAILURE TO FOLLOW DUE PROCESS.
U.S.D.C. - Eastern District of Texas (191802)
#10
$________ RECOVERY – EMINENT DOMAIN – TAKING BY NJ TPK AUTHORITY FOR ROAD WIDENING PROJECT AND PLACEMENT OF GAS PIPELINE UNDER PARKING AND LOADING DOCK OF RECENTLY BUILT WAREHOUSE.
Mercer County, NJ (191590)
Your cart is empty
More Cases. Less Money. Subscribe Now.
Let Our expert Researchers Do The Searching For You! Pro Search Service