. .

Your search results for Seatbelt Defect


Filter results by
Results 1 - 10 of 156

#1
$________ VERDICT – PRODUCT LIABLITY – LACK OF CRASHWORTHINESS IN ________ ACURA INTEGRA – DEFECTIVE DESIGNED SEAT BELT SYSTEM – ROLLOVER COLLISION – ________ HEAD STRIKES ROOF - PERMANENT QUADRIPLEGIA.
Philadelphia County, PA (193799)
#2
$________ VERDICT Product Liability – Defective design – Faulty seatbelt leaves man paralyzed – Quadriplegia
Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas (193809)
#3
$________ VERDICT - PRODUCTS LIABILITY – AUTOMOTIVE DEFECT – DEFECTIVE SEAT BELT/RESTRAINT SYSTEM – ________ CATASTROPHICALLY INJURED IN LOW SPEED ROLL OVER COLLISION – QUADRIPLEGIA.
Philadelphia County, PA (193386)
#4
________ VERDICT – STATE LIABILITY – ALLEGED DANGEROUS ROAD CONDITION – FAILURE TO WARN OF CHANGE FROM ASPHALT TO DIRT ROAD – CLAIMED NEGLIGENT MAINTENANCE OF DIRT ROAD – ROLL-OVER COLLISION – WRONGFUL DEATH.
Indian River County, FL (190582)
#5
________ VERDICT Product Liability – Defective designs of roof strength and seat belt – Failure to have rollover activated seat belt pretensioners and side window curtains – Traumatic Brain Injury – C2 odontoid fracture – T1, T2 and T3 vertebrae fractures – Pelvic fractures – Left wrist fracture – Broken ribs.
Washoe County, NV (189378)
#6
________ VERDICT – PRODUCT LIABILITY – DEFECTIVE DESIGN OF TRACTOR – TRACTOR DESIGN FAILS TO SHUT OFF POWER WHEN ________ IS EJECTED FROM OPERATOR SEAT – ________ IS RUN OVER BY TRACTOR – EXTENSIVE INJURIES INCLUDING MULTIPLE FRACTURES, CRUSHED PELVIS AND TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY.
San Diego County, CA (189183)
#7
________ VERDICT Product Liability – Manufacturing Defect – Man sues after tractor fails to auto-stop and runs him over.
Superior Court of San Diego County, San Diego (188501)
#8
________ DISPOSITION FOLLOWING ________ BY ________ OF CASE ON MORNING OF TRIAL Product Liability – Defective Design – ________ alleges malfunction of seatbelt and failure of airbags to deploy during collision.
Beauregard County, LA (187623)
#9
________ VERDICT – PRODUCT LIABILITY – DEFECTIVE DESIGN OF YAMAHA ________ RHINO SIDE-BY-SIDE – ________ RHINO ALLEGEDLY LACKS ADEQUATE OCCUPANT PROTECTION – DEFECTIVE SEATS AND SEAT BELTS – HEAD INJURY – SOFT TISSUE INJURIES – PTSD ALLEGED.
San Bernardino County, CA (185694)
#10
$________ for ________ - Products Liability - The ________ suffered devastating abdominal and lower extremity injuries after being involved in a head-on collision with a drunk driver ? the ________ blamed Nissan (the manufacturer of the SUV her husband was driving) and blamed her injuries on a combination of a seat belt defect and a collapsing seat ? a Stanford jury found a defect and also assessed punitive damages of $2.5 million against Nissan
Lincoln (185207)
Your cart is empty
More Cases. Less Money. Subscribe Now.
Let Our expert Researchers Do The Searching For You! Pro Search Service