. .

Your search results for Earthquake


Filter results by
Results 1 - 10 of 22

#1
$________ RECOVERY – CONTRACT – U.S. GOVERNMENT OVER-DEPLOYS SOFTWARE USED TO COORDINATE TROOP MOVEMENTS – VIOLATION OF PURCHASED LICENSE AGREEMENT.
United States Federal Claims Court (191687)
#2
$________ VERDICT – ELEVATOR NEGLIGENCE – FAILURE TO MAINTAIN – EXCESSIVELY WORN SPEED CONTROL DEVICE – SUDDEN STOP AS ELEVATOR RAPIDLY DESCENDS FROM 20TH FLOOR – CERVICAL HERNIATION – DISC REPLACEMENT SURGERY – LUMBAR SOFT TISSUE INJURIES – CONTUSIONS.
Hudson County, NJ (190446)
#3
________ VERDICT Insurance obligation - Bad faith - ________ allegedly wrongfully denies insurance claim related to theft of building materials.
Los Angeles County, California (182287)
#4
________ verdict - Auto Negligence - ________ claimed to have been injured in a rear-end collision; ________ admitted fault and argued that ________ alleged injuries were pre-existing
Jefferson (164997)
#5
$________ CONFIDENTIAL RECOVERY Worksite negligence - Inadequate drainage and lighting at site - Ladder slipped away from the ________ causing him to fall and strike his head - Loss of consciousness - Closed head injury.
Massachusetts (143180)
#6
$________ for Ogborn assessed 50% to McDonald's; $________ for Summers assessed 50% to McDonald's; ________ verdict on liability for Dockery - Negligent Security - A teenage girl, a McDonald's employee, was strip-searched and sexually assaulted in the store office by her female manager and then by the manager's fiance, all at the direction of a third-party caller pretending to be a police officer, but who was actually perpetrating a hoax - the girl sued McDonald's alleging negligent security as there was evidence the hamburger company was aware of numerous incidents of this hoax, yet took no steps to train or warn its managers - the manager who effectuated the strip search and brought in her fiance, also sued McDonald's and alleged outrage regarding the company's treatment of her
Bullitt (140678)
#7
________ verdict on liability - Bad Faith - In a property damage case arising from the ________ Northridge earthquake, the ________ alleged bad faith by his insurer in adjusting the claim
California Central - Los Angeles (144583)
#8
________ verdict on liability - BAD FAITH - ________ alleged the handling of an earthquake property damage claim was bungled, her insurer relying on a fraudulent adjustor (who never looked at her property) to deny her claim
California Central District - Los Angeles (144032)
#9
$________ VERDICT Wrongful denial of claim under homeowners policy - Failure to pay for retaining wall repairs - Removal of debris required.
Philadelphia County (38482)
#10
$________ for ________ - Auto Negligence - ________, with persistent soft-tissue injury, awarded $________ for suffering
Laurel (1) (142596)
123 next >