. .

Your search results for Safety Harness


Filter results by
Results 1 - 10 of 16

#1
$________ RECOVERY Product Liability – Failure to provide proper fall protection on picker – ________ utilized ________ harness system and fell to the ground when harness failed to provide adequate fall protection – L4-L5 disc herniation – Right distal radial fracture – Right patellar fracture – Right medial cuniform
Cook County, IL (194159)
#2
________ VERDICT Sec. ________ (1) Labor Law – ________ contends defective plank breaks during construction, causing six foot fall – ________ maintains ________ fails to use available safety harness – Rib fractures – Pneumothorax
Kings County, NY (194328)
#3
$________ RECOVERY – Lumbar herniation and failed fusion – Fracture to dominant right wrist – Right patella fracture – Lisfranc fracture – Left scaphoid fracture – Waiver of approximately $________ compensation lien added to recovery
Cook County, IL (193912)
#4
$________ VERDICT - FAILURE TO ADEQUATELY INSPECT ROCK CLIMBING WALL EQUIPMENT - FAILURE OF HYDRAULIC BELAY CABLE ATTACHMENT - FALL TO GROUND - COMPRESSION FRACTURES OF THREE LUMBAR VERTEBRAE - BURST PILON FRACTURE OF TIBIA AND FIBULA - ANKLE FUSION.
West Palm Beach, FL (158447)
#5
$________ for ________ - Products Liability - A hunter was strangled to death when the treestand and safety harness he was using failed and caused him to fall; after the now defunct manufacturer failed to answer the complaint and the hunter's estate was awarded a default judgment on liability, the case was tried solely on damages against an empty chair
Tippecanoe, Superior (167183)
#6
VERDICT FINDING ________ 75% NEGLIGENT AND ________ 25% NEGLIGENT, PRECLUDING RECOVERY - CONSTRUCTION SITE NEGLIGENCE - CONTRACTOR NEGLIGENCE - ALLEGED FAILURE TO PROVIDE SAFETY FALL EQUIPMENT TO THE ________ - THE ________ FALLS 27 FEET - TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY - MULTIPLE FRACTURES TO SKULL, FACE AND EXTREMITIES.
Middlesex County, Massachusetts (64544)
#7
________ verdict on liability - Products Liability - In a single vehicle crash against a bridge, the airbag in a Jeep did not deploy - the ________ suffered serious injuries - in this lawsuit he alleged a manufacturing defect in that the airbag sensor was not properly connected
Nashville, TN (Davidson Circuit Court) State Court (146311)
#8
________ verdict - Products Liability - Auto Defect - Airbag - In a single vehicle crash against a bridge, the airbag in a Jeep did not deploy - The ________ suffered serious injuries - ________ alleged a manufacturing defect in that the airbag sensor was not properly connected.
Davidson (163552)
#9
$________ RECOVERY DURING TRIAL Defective and dangerous design - Failure of vehicle to be equipped with shoulder harness center rear seat belt - Center rear seat passenger is rendered paraplegic.
Los Angeles County, California (43323)
#10
$________ VERDICT ________ is injured in fall when scaffolding breaks at ________ contractor's work site - Non-displaced compression fractures of p 7 3 vertebrae and hip.
Middlesex County, Massachusetts (14570)
12 next >  
Your cart is empty
More Cases. Less Money. Subscribe Now.
Let Our expert Researchers Do The Searching For You! Pro Search Service

Related Searches