. .

Your search results for Allergist Malpractice


Filter results by
Results 1 - 10 of 11

#1
________ VERDICT Alleged failure by allergist to diagnose inverted papilloma of sinus cavity when he treated ________ for allergies over course of nineteen months - Subsequent surgical removal of papilloma by ENT surgeon.
New York County, New York (8249)
#2
________ VERDICT Alleged failure by allergist to diagnose inverted papilloma of sinus cavity when he treated ________ for allergies over course of nineteen months - Subsequent surgical removal of papilloma by ENT surgeon.
New York County (24836)
#3
________ VERDICT Necessary care unreasonably withheld by HMO - Physician makes assessment and provides treatment without clinical examination - Allergist allegedly negligent in failing to personally examined patient during course of immunotherapy treatments.
Dutchess County, New York (7879)
#4
$________ GROSS VERDICT IN N.J. CASE AGAINST ALLERGIST AND $________ PRIOR RECOVERY IN N.Y. CASE AGAINST OTOLARYNGOLOGIST - FAILURE TO CONSIDER CEREBRAL/SPINAL FLUID LEAK AS DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS DESPITE CONSTANT AND EXTENSIVE NASAL DISCHARGE - FAILURE TO DIAGNOSE BACTERIAL MENINGITIS - BRAIN DAMAGE.
Middlesex County and New York County, N.Y. (28955)
#5
$________ GROSS VERDICT IN N.J. CASE AGAINST ALLERGIST AND $________ PRIOR RECOVERY IN N.Y. CASE AGAINST OTOLARYNGOLOGIST - FAILURE TO CONSIDER CEREBRAL/SPINAL FLUID LEAK AS DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS DESPITE CONSTANT AND EXTENSIVE NASAL DISCHARGE - FAILURE TO DIAGNOSE BACTERIAL MENINGITIS - BRAIN DAMAGE.
Middlesex County, N.J. and New York County, N.Y. (28933)
#6
$________ GROSS VERDICT IN N.J. CASE AGAINST ALLERGIST AND $________ PRIOR RECOVERY IN N.Y. CASE AGAINST OTOLARYNGOLOGIST - FAILURE TO CONSIDER CEREBRAL/SPINAL FLUID LEAK AS DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS DESPITE CONSTANT AND EXTENSIVE NASAL DISCHARGE - FAILURE TO DIAGNOSE BACTERIAL MENINGITIS - BRAIN DAMAGE.
Middlesex County and New York County, N.Y. (32633)
#7
________ VERDICT "Withheld care by HMO" - "Remote practice of allergy" - ________ contends that allergist should have personally examined her during course of immunotherapy treatments.
Dutchess County (24520)
#8
$________ GROSS VERDICT IN N.J. CASE AGAINST ALLERGIST AND $________ PRIOR RECOVERY IN N.Y. CASE AGAINST OTOLARYNGOLOGIST - FAILURE TO CONSIDER CEREBRAL/SPINAL FLUID LEAK AS DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS DESPITE CONSTANT AND EXTENSIVE NASAL DISCHARGE - FAILURE TO DIAGNOSE BACTERIAL MENINGITIS - BRAIN DAMAGE.
New York County and Middlesex County, N.J. (33864)
#9
$________ RECOVERY Wrongful Death - Allergist/Internist allegedly improperly responds to anaphylactic reaction to allergy shots.
Massachusetts (13643)
#10
$________ RECOVERY Allergist/Internist malpractice - Alleged improper response to anaphylactic reaction to allergy shots - Wrongful death.
Massachusetts (6927)
12 next >  
Your cart is empty
More Cases. Less Money. Subscribe Now.
Let Our expert Researchers Do The Searching For You! Pro Search Service