. .

Your search results for Consumer Fraud


Filtration options are available for subscribers only.

Try JVRA for a day or a month, or sign up for our deluxe Litigation Support Plan and put the intelligence of JVRA to work for all of your clients. See our subscription plans.


#61
$________ VERDICT Consumer protection law – Violation of Florida Consumer Collection Practices Act – Harassing telephone calls by creditor – Continued contact with ________ despite legal representation – Damages only.
Pinellas County, FL (187137)
#62
$________ VERDICT PLUS ATTORNEY FEES UNDER CONSUMER PROTECTION STATUTE Product Liability – Manufacturing Defect – ________ buys bunk beds that are contaminated with bed bugs – Bites to six-year-old twins and emotional distress of mother – Damages only.
Anne Arundel County, MD (187237)
#63
________ VERDICT Consumer Fraud – Chapter 93A claim – ________ purchase a greenhouse from the ________ and allege it is defective – Leaks made it unsuitable for advertised "year round" – Breach of warranty.
Norfolk County, MA (187267)
#64
________ VERDICT Contract – ________ alleges that the ________ breached its mortgage agreement with the ________ – Chapter 93A violation alleged.
Plymouth County, MA (187269)
#65
$________ VERDICT Consumer Fraud – Deceptive Business Practices – ________ alleges that ________ materially misrepresented accident history of vehicle.
Cook County, IL (185586)
#66
$________ VERDICT Contract – Consumer Fraud Act – Condo owners sue after new construction disrupts their view of the Manhattan Skyline – $________ million in damages.
Superior Court of Hudson County (185681)
#67
$________ VERDICT Construction Contract – Home renovation – Homeowner ________ refuses to make payment on monies due for renovations.
Middlesex County, MA (185881)
#68
$________ JUDGMENT FOLLOWING DEFAULT INCLUDING AWARD OF TREBLE DAMAGES Consumer Fraud – Fraudulent inducement – Real property – ________ alleges that the ________ misrepresented herself as an attorney and defrauded the ________ on a real estate transaction – Section 93A claim.
Withheld County, MA (185885)
#69
$________ AWARD FOLLOWING ________ JURY VERDICT – CONSUMER FRAUD – 93A CLAIM FOR UNFAIR AND/OR DECEPTIVE BUSINESS PRACTICES – ALLEGED INTENTIONAL AVOIDANCE OF BUILDING CODE COMPLIANCE – DECEDENT SUFFERS FATAL FALL ON STAIRWAY.
Suffolk County, MA (185910)
#70
$________ VERDICT – FRAUD – STATE OF TEXAS SUES DEBT INVALIDATION COMPANY FOR DEFRAUDING CUSTOMERS – ________ VIOLATIONS OF BOTH TEXAS'S DECEPTIVE TRADE PRACTICES ACT AND CREDIT SERVICES ORGANIZATION ACT – VIOLATIONS OF THE TEXAS BUSINESS OPPORTUNITY ACT.
215th District Court (186482)