. .

Your search results for Inadequate Warnings


Filter results by
Results 41 - 50 of 811

#41
________ VERDICT Product Liability – Defective Design of Exhaust Fan – ________ insurance company alleges that the ________ defective exhaust fan caused a fire that required the ________ insurer to make a claim payment – Marketing of inherently unsafe device – Failure to warn.
U.S.District Court - District of Rhode Island (192385)
#42
$________ VERDICT – PRODUCT LIABILITY – FAILURE TO WARN – ________ PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY AWARE OF POTENTIAL FOR TOPAMAX TO CAUSE BIRTH DEFECTS WHEN ADMINISTERED TO PREGNANT WOMEN.
Philadelphia County, PA (192470)
#43
$________ VERDICT – PRODUCT LIABILITY – FAILURE TO WARN – TOXIC TORT – TOPAMAX IS BLAMED FOR CHILD'S BIRTH DEFECT – CLEFT PALATE IN NEWBORN.
Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas (192003)
#44
________ VERDICT – ASBESTOS – PRODUCT LIABILITY – FAILURE TO WARN – ________ ALLEGEDLY DEVELOPS MESOTHELIOMA AS A RESULT OF USING JOINT COMPOUND MANUFACTURED BY ________.
Madison County, IL (191695)
#45
$________ VERDICT – PRODUCT LIABILITY – FAILURE TO WARN OF BIRTH DEFECTS RISKS ABOUT TOPAMAX – NEGLIGENCE, FRAUD AND MISREPRESENTATION – MINOR MALE BORN WITH CLEFT LIP AND CLEFT PALATE.
Philadelphia County, PA (191770)
#46
$________ CONFIDENTIAL RECOVERY Construction Site Negligence – Product Liability – ________ falls as a result of a defective piece of machinery that would have been discovered by a safety inspection of the job site – Knee injury requiring knee replacement.
Withheld County, MA (191256)
#47
$________ VERDICT – ASBESTOS – WOMAN CONTRACTS MESOTHELIOMA FROM EXPOSURE TO HUSBAND PIPE INSTALLER’S WORK CLOTHES.
Alameda County Superior Court (190966)
#48
$________ VERDICT – PRODUCT LIABILITY – FAILURE TO WARN – ________ VICTORY IN FIRST LAWSUIT AGAINST PHARMACEUTICAL HUMIRA – WRONGFUL DEATH.
Cook County Circuit Court (190972)
#49
$________ VERDICT – PRODUCT LIABILITY – MANUFACTURING DEFECT – PLASTIC USED IN TRANSVAGINAL MESH ALLEGEDLY UNSAFE FOR HUMAN IMPLANTATION – PAIN, BLEEDING, MULTIPLE SURGERIES.
U.S.D.C. - Southern District of West Virginia (190973)
#50
CONFIDENTIAL RECOVERY – PRODUCT LIABILITY – DEFECTIVE DESIGN OF TRANSVAGINAL MESH – SECOND CASE REGARDING PRODUCT – SUBSTANTIAL HEALTH COMPLICATIONS RESULTING FROM MEDICAL DEVICE FAILURE.
U.S.D.C. - Southern District of West Virginia (190974)
Your cart is empty
More Cases. Less Money. Subscribe Now.
Let Our expert Researchers Do The Searching For You! Pro Search Service

Related Searches