. .

Your search results for Intellectual Property Rights


Filter results by
Results 41 - 50 of 441

#41
________ VERDICT Intellectual Property – Pharmaceutical company seeks injunction against generic equivalent of Lysteda – Infringement of U.S. patents.
U.S. District Court - District of Nevada (192821)
#42
$________ VERDICT – BREACH – INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY – PHARMACEUTICAL GIANTS CLASH OVER GENERIC PAXIL AGREEMENT – VIOLATION OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AGREEMENT.
U.S.D.C. - District of New Jersey (192868)
#43
$________ VERDICT – INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY – PATENT – SETTLEMENT RESOLVES LONG COURT BATTLE OVER MEDICAL EQUIPMENT PATENT – ALLEGED WILLFUL INFRINGEMENT OF PATENT ________.
U.S.D.C. - Western District of Pennsylvania (192937)
#44
$________ VERDICT PHARMACEUTICAL LIABILITY – TOPAMAX LITIGATION – ________ PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY KNEW OF THE POTENTIAL FOR TOPAMAX TO CAUSE BIRTH DEFECTS WHEN ADMINISTERED TO PREGNANT AND FAILED TO WARN THE PUBLIC OF THE DANGERS.
Philadelphia County, PA (192695)
#45
________ JUDGMENT Contract – ________ insured contends ________ insurance company is obligated to pay costs incurred before ________ was notified of underlying claim.
U.S. District Court - Southern District of Florida (192071)
#46
$________ RECOVERY – INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY – COMPANIES SETTLE INFRINGEMENT CASE OVER HAIR REMOVAL LASER – INFRINGEMENT OF MULTIPLE PATENTS.
U.S.D.C. - District of Massachusetts (192138)
#47
$________ VERDICT – CONTRACT – TAIWANESE COMPANY BREACHES CONTRACT STEMMING FROM EARLIER INFRINGEMENT SUIT – BREACH OF SETTLEMENT.
U.S.D.C., E. TX (192269)
#48
$________ VERDICT – INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY – MASSIVE CELL PHONE MANUFACTURER IS ACCUSED OF PATENT INFRINGEMENT OF SEVERAL US PATENTS.
U.S.D.C. - Middle District of Florida (192305)
#49
CONFIDENTIAL RECOVERY Intellectual Property – Patent Infringement – Telecomm company sues dot-com for VoIP Product.
U.S.D.C. - Eastern District of Virginia (192369)
#50
$________ VERDICT – PRODUCT LIABILITY – FAILURE TO WARN – ________ PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY AWARE OF POTENTIAL FOR TOPAMAX TO CAUSE BIRTH DEFECTS WHEN ADMINISTERED TO PREGNANT WOMEN.
Philadelphia County, PA (192470)