. .

Your search results for Inadequate Warnings


Filter results by
Results 31 - 40 of 811

#31
$________ PARTIAL RECOVERY Product Liability – Failure to Warn – ________ services defective tire – Fails to remove spare tire – Fails to warn ________ age of tire – Wrongful death; injuries; damages; medical expenses.
269th (193414)
#32
________ VERDICT – PRODUCT LIABILITY – DEFECTIVE DESIGN – COMPANY PREVAILS IN SUIT OVER MOTORCROSS BRACE – PARAPLEGIA.
U.S.D.C., N OH (193476)
#33
________ VERDICT Asbestos – Product liability – Failure to Warn – Dangerous Defective Product – ________ contended that ________ was responsible for exposing decedent to asbestos, which caused cancer while working with ________ brake products – Pleural mesothelioma – Wrongful death.
Los Angeles County, CA (193477)
#34
$________ VERDICT – ASBESTOS – PRODUCT LIABILITY – BREACH OF IMPLIED WARRANTY OF MERCHANTABILITY – RECKLESS DISREGARD – ________ ALLEGED HE WAS EXPOSED TO THE ________ SPRAY INSULATION WHICH CONTAINED ASBESTOS – MESOTHELIOMA
USDC, District of Massachusetts (193495)
#35
$________ VERDICT – ASBESTOS – PRODUCT LIABILITY – FAILURE TO WARN – THE ________ AUTO MECHANIC ALLEGED THAT ________ WAS LIABLE FOR HIS CANCER DUE TO FAILURE TO WARN ABOUT THE DANGERS OF ASBESTOS IN ITS AUTOMOTIVE PARTS – MESOTHELIOMA
New York County, NY (193548)
#36
$________ VERDICT – MEDICAL MALPRACTICE – NEGLIGENCE DURING ELECTIVE LARYNGEAL LASER SURGERY – ________ AIRWAY IS SET ON FIRE WHEN ENDOTRACHEAL TUBE IGNITES – ________ IS UNABLE TO SPEAK, VENTILATOR DEPENDENT – SHORTENED LIFE EXPECTANCY AS A RESULT OF INCIDENT.
King County, WA (193225)
#37
________ VERDICT Asbestos Exposure – Product Liability – Failure to Warn – Defective/Dangerous Product – ________ alleged that ________ was responsible for the decedent's asbestos exposure – Mesothelioma – Wrongful Death.
Madison County, IL (192817)
#38
$________ RECOVERY – PRODUCT LIABILITY DEFECTIVE SPECIALIZED VEHICLE USED TO DEPLOY CONCRETE ROADWAY BARRIERS DURING HIGHWAY PROJECT – MECHANIC FALLS WHILE DESCENDING MACHINE IS NOT IN USE – SEVERE ANKLE INJURY – CPRS – ANKLE FUSION.
Monmouth County, NJ (192873)
#39
________ VERDICT – PRODUCT LIABILITY – ALLEGED DEFECT IN ________ FORD FOCUS – LACK OF ELECTRONIC STABILITY CONTROL – LOSS OF CONTROL OF VEHICLE – DROWNING DEATH OF 16-YEAR-OLD BOY.
Broward County, FL (192552)
#40
$________ VERDICT – PRODUCT LIABILITY – PHARMACEUTICAL – RETRIAL ON ACCUTANE VERDICT – ULCERATIVE COLITIS.
Atlantic County Superior Court (192639)
Your cart is empty
More Cases. Less Money. Subscribe Now.
Let Our expert Researchers Do The Searching For You! Pro Search Service

Related Searches