. .

Your search results for Antitrust


Filter results by
Results 21 - 30 of 45

#21
$________ VERDICT - ________ BUS COMPANY CLAIMS COLLUSION BETWEEN CITY OF HARTFORD AND SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION FOR AWARDING SCHOOL DISTRICT BUSING CONTRACT - CITY WAIVES APPLICATION OF ORDINANCES IN SELECTING HIGHER COMPETITIVE BID.
New London Judicial District, Connecticut (30648)
#22
$________ VERDICT ON REMAND INCLUDING $________ IN PUNITIVE DAMAGES Tortious interference with contract by HMO - Drugstore chain pressured in to using healthcare subsidiary as administrator of company medical plan.
U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania (6383)
#23
$________ VERDICT ON REMAND INCLUDING $________ IN PUNITIVE DAMAGES - TORTIOUS INTERFERENCE WITH CONTRACT BY HEALTH MAINTENANCE ORGANIZATION - DRUGSTORE CHAIN PRESSURED INTO USING U.S. HEALTHCARE SUBSIDIARY AS ADMINISTRATOR OF COMPANY MEDICAL PLAN.
U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pa. (40576)
#24
STATE ANTITRUST AND TORTIOUS INTERFERENCE
14TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT, DALLAS COUNTY, DALLAS, TEX, TX (175344)
#25
$________ VERDICT INCLUDING $1 MILLION IN PUNITIVE DAMAGES - SHERMAN ANTITRUST ACT VIOLATIONS - VIOLATION OF RACKETEERING INFLUENCED CORRUPT ORGANIZATIONS ACT (RICO) - DRUGSTORE CHAIN ALLEGEDLY PRESSURED INTO USING U.S. HEALTHCARE SUBSIDIARY AS ADMINISTRATOR OF COMPANY MEDICAL PLAN.
U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pa. (40260)
#26
$________ VERDICT INCLUDING $1 MILLION IN PUNITIVE DAMAGES - SHERMAN ANTITRUST ACT VIOLATIONS - VIOLATION OF RACKETEERING INFLUENCED CORRUPT ORGANIZATIONS ACT (RICO) - DRUGSTORE CHAIN ALLEGEDLY PRESSURED INTO USING U.S. HEALTHCARE SUBSIDIARY AS ADMINISTRATOR OF COMPANY MEDICAL PLAN.
U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pa. (28151)
#27
$________ VERDICT - DEFAMATION - BREACH OF CONTRACT - LETTER FALSELY ACCUSES DOCTOR OF ENDANGERING PATIENTS' SAFETY IN OPERATING ROOM - DAMAGE TO PROFESSIONAL REPUTATION - JUDGMENT NOTWITHSTANDING THE VERDICT GRANTED FOR ________ SUBSEQUENT TO VERDICT.
Dade County, Florida (28201)
#28
$________ VERDICT - DEFAMATION - BREACH OF CONTRACT - LETTER FALSELY ACCUSES DOCTOR OF ENDANGERING PATIENTS' SAFETY IN OPERATING ROOM - DAMAGE TO PROFESSIONAL REPUTATION - JUDGMENT NOTWITHSTANDING THE VERDICT GRANTED FOR ________ SUBSEQUENT TO VERDICT.
Dade County (27700)
#29
$________ VERDICT INCLUDING $________ PUNITIVE AWARD - ANTITRUST - INTENTIONAL INTERFERENCE WITH CONTRACT - LIBEL - TRADE LIBEL - SUIT BROUGHT AGAINST ________ HOSPITAL, MEDICAL GROUP AND AMBULANCE SERVICE ALLEGING ________ UNDERTOOK TO PREVENT ________ FROM OPENING UP A COMPETING HOSPITAL IN THE SURROUNDING AREA - ________ COUNTERCLAIMS ALLEGING MISAPPROPRIATION OF TRADE SECRETS.
San Bernardino County, California (28029)
#30
$________ VERDICT ON ________ COUNTERCLAIM -________ VERDICT ON ________ DIRECT CLAIM - ________ COMPANY ALLEGES BREACH OF MARKETING CONTRACTS, FRAUDULENT INDUCEMENT, TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT, FEDERAL ANTI-TRUST VIOLATIONS, THEFT OF TRADE SECRETS AND UNFAIR COMPETITION - ________ COUNTERCLAIM ALLEGING BREACH OF MARKETING CONTRACTS, FRAUDULENT INDUCEMENT AND TORTIOUS INTERFERENCE WITH ________' EXCLUSIVE MARKETING RIGHTS FORCING ________ OUT OF BUSINESS.
U.S. District Court for Southern District of Ohio (29991)
< prev  12345 next >  
Your cart is empty
More Cases. Less Money. Subscribe Now.
Let Our expert Researchers Do The Searching For You! Pro Search Service