. .

Your search results for Consumer Fraud


Filter results by
Results 21 - 30 of 355

#21
$________ VERDICT TREBLED TO $________ UNDER CONSUMER FRAUD STATUTE ________, who was in Kazakhstan, contends he bought automobile from ________ NJ auto dealer's website, and that the car was not shipped and a refund was not made – ________ attends NJ trial and contends despite demands
Union County, NJ (193984)
#22
$________ RECOVERY – Class action – Fraud – Car Rental Agency Accused of Overcharging on Tolls - Violation of NJ Consumer Fraud Act.
U.S.D.C., NJ (193336)
#23
$3 MILLION SETTLEMENT – CLASS ACTION – TERMS OF USE – EXCESSIVE MESSAGING FROM BUFFALO BILLS LEADS TO SUIT – VIOLATION OF FEDERAL TELEPHONE CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT.
U.S.D.C. - Middle Disrict of Florida (193010)
#24
$________ ________ VERDICT FOLLOWING JURY TRIAL – COURT GRANTS JUDGMENT NOTWITHSTANDING THE VERDICT IN FAVOR OF ________ Construction Negligence – Breach of Contract – Consumer Fraud – ________ alleged that ________ breached a contract between the parties and committed consumer fraud when ________ home was built upon poor subsurface consisting of trash and materials that resulted in a sink hole – Repairs in excess of $________.
Norfolk County, MA (192848)
#25
$________ VERDICT – ________ VERDICT ON COUNTERCLAIM Contract – Alleged breach of contract for luxury home project manager’s fee – Consumer fraud counter-claim by ________.
Bergen County, NJ (192412)
#26
________ VERDICT Consumer Fraud – ________ misrepresent the nature of horse that they sold to the ________ – ________ is injured when the horse takes off as the ________ attempted to mount the horse – Falsely advertising the nature of the horse for sale – Permanent injuries to the ________ back.
U.S.D.C. - Eastern District of New York (191985)
#27
$________-$3.________ RECOVERY WITH $1.9 MILLION ATTORNEY FEES Consumer Fraud – BMW settles with class for minis sold with defective transmissions – Out-of-pocket expenses and/or loss of vehicle value at resale.
U.S.D.C. - Central District of California (191899)
#28
________ VERDICT Consumer Fraud – Alleged negligent misrepresentation of training level of horse purchased over the internet – ________ purchaser is thrown from horse when riding – Compression vertebral fractures – Liability only.
U.S. District Court - Eastern District of New York (191827)
#29
$________ CONFIDENTIAL RECOVERY – UNSAFE WORKPLACE – FAILURE OF EMPLOYEES TO PROPERLY DE-ENERGIZE AIR COMPRESSOR ________ TECHNICIAN WAS REPAIRING – ELECTRICAL SHOCK – FALL DOWN – BACK INJURIES REQUIRING MULTIPLE SPINAL SURGERIES.
Withheld County, MA (191462)
#30
$________ VERDICT INCLUDING DOUBLED DAMAGES AND ATTORNEY FEES PER STATUTE – CONSUMER FRAUD – CHAPTER 93A VIOLATION – LEGAL NEGLIGENCE IN UNDERLYING REAL ESTATE PURCHASE – FAILURE TO ADVISE PURCHASER ABOUT NATIVE AMERICAN GRAVESITE ON PROPERTY PRIOR TO SALE AFTER ATTORNEY WAS NOTIFIED BY STATE HISTORICAL PRESERVATION DEPARTMENT.
Norfolk County, MA (191465)